research objectives: To determine whether methacholine challenge testing (MCT) causes vocal cord dysfunction (VCD).

research objectives: To determine whether methacholine challenge testing (MCT) causes vocal cord dysfunction (VCD), as evidenced by way of inspiratory vocal cord closure onward direct laryngoscopy, and whether spirometry and flow-volume nooses (FVLs) demonstrate any changes that are suggestive of VCD

Design: Prospective, controll study

Setting: Army medical center

Patients: Thirty-four make liables all with normal baseline spirometry. Ten make subordinates had documented evidence of VCD 12 exposes had exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and reactive MCT and 12 make liables served as healthy asymptomatic regulate subjects.

Methods: Measurement of spirometry with FVL and direct laryngoscopy of the vocal cords performed immediately before and after subdues had undergone MCT.

Results: Evidence of inspiratory vocal cord adduction was place in four VCD patients. sum of two units patients had adducted vocal cords at baseline, and their conditions were unchanged after undergoing MCT couple other patients had normal conditions at baseline and demonstrated acute inspiratory vocal cord adduction after undergoing MCT None of the patients in the EIA or dominion government groups had evidence of VCD at baseline or after undergoing MCT Truncation of the inspiratory limb of the FVL after MCT was noted in five patients, which correlated with evidence of VCD in 60% of these patients. single EIA patient had truncation of the inspiratory FVL after MCT and no changes were raise in the control group. A comparison of spirometry between EIA patients and VCD patients with and without evidence of inspiratory vocal cord adduction during MCT showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: The findings allude to that MCT may cause an acute episode of vocal cord adduction and that positive issues may not reflect underlying reactive airways disease. However, a flattening or truncation of the inspiratory FVL after the patient undergoe MCT is not diagnostic for the demeanor of inspiratory vocal cord adduction.

elucidation words: bronchoprovocation; direct laryngoscopy; exercise-induced asthma; methacholine challenge testing; vocal cord dysfunction

Abbreviations: EIA = exercise-induced asthma; FVL = flow-volume loop; MCT = methacholine challenge testing; RAD = reactive airways disease; VCD = vocal cord dysfunction

**********

Vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) is a respiratory condition that is characterized by the agency of abnormal adduction of the vocal cords. greatest in number commonly, VCD is manifested by way of a paradoxical inspiratory closure of the vocal cords, although it les repeatedly involves the expiratory phase. Symptoms include wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, stridor, or exertional dyspnea. (1) Patients with VCD are as a common thing [i]or[/i] matter misdiagnosed as having poorly controll or exercise-induced asthma (EIA), and their answer to standard asthma therapy is generally poor. (2) These patients guard to present with recurrent symptoms forward a frequent basis before the correct diagnosis is made. The diagnosis can be difficult since VCD mimics asthma still should be considered in those patients with inspiratory stridor or localized wheezing above the trachea. Direct visualization of the vocal cords via laryngoscopy remains the "gold standard" for the evaluation of patients with vocal cord abnormalities. (34) Findings that are consistent with VCD forward laryngoscopy include inspiratory closure of the vocal cords with posterior chinking (ie, a small opening at the posterior portion of the vocal cords), and a certain quantity of vocal cord closure may be seen during the expiratory phase. (25) Flow-volume loophole (FVL) testing during spirometry can reveal the characteristic flattening or truncation of the inspiratory limb that is consistent with variable extrathoracic obstruction, if it be not that this finding is generally absent unles patients are acutely symptomatic. (5)

A significant challenge in establishing the diagnosis of VCD is the similarity of its symptoms to those of asthma. There are numerous case reports of patients who have been treated incorrectly for asthma athwart long periods of time based forward these symptoms. Bronchoprovocation testing is typically part of the evaluation of patients with normal baseline spirometry findings whose symptoms give an inkling of asthma. Methacholine challenge testing (MCT) is a belonging to all procedure of choice for bronchoprovocation testing, with well-established guidelines having been appoint by the American Thoracic Society. (6) That consensus statement commits detecting inspiratory stridor during the examination and evaluating the inspiratory FVL for evidence of a plateau or flattening of the bight to diagnose VCD. The initial case series of five VCD patients in 1983 according to Christopher et al (2) demonstrated that all patients had normal spirometry values at baseline and that none had reactive airways after undergoing MCT or histamine challenge testing. Patients in other case series (57-9) who had received diagnoses of either asthma or EIA had similar negative MCT findings. However, the consequence s of other studies have put in mind ofed an overlap between VCD and asthma. The largest series of 95 VCD patients through Newman and Dubester (10) established that 53% of VCD patients had coexistent asthma based in succession bronchoprovocation testing or peak liquefy variability. Thirty-five percent of patients in another case series (11) of 20 patients also were establish to have underlying obstructive airways disease.

...